Federal access restrictions have steadily eroded the Limited Access Death Master File. Today it captures less than 16% of U.S. deaths, and the cost of that gap quietly accumulates inside fraud reviews, reclamations, member account servicing, and audit findings.
Years supporting financial institutions
Match accuracy
Client renewal rate
For years, the Death Master File was the default source for identifying deceased account holders. Federal access restrictions that took effect in 2011 have steadily reduced what it sees.
Today the LADMF captures less than 16% of U.S. deaths. Most institutions are still running the same checks they always have, while the data underneath them has quietly moved.
Many banks and credit unions are now reassessing how they monitor for deceased customers and members across their portfolios.
The gap rarely shows up in one place. It surfaces across operations over time.
Most banks and credit unions don’t find this gap directly. It surfaces through other workflows.
Fraud teams often see it first, when a deceased person’s Social Security number is used to open or access a customer or member account.
Federal benefit payments continue after death, followed by reclamation requests with limited recovery options once funds have moved.
Accounts without a living owner add complexity to unclaimed property audits and state reporting timelines.
When records aren’t current, families navigating accounts after a death run into delays at an already difficult time.
Once a deceased account holder is identified, banks and credit unions are often responsible for locating beneficiaries or next of kin. Outdated relationship and contact data slows resolution, increases operational load, and adds friction for families during a sensitive time.
In response, banks and credit unions are moving past reliance on a single dataset. Most are taking a few steps in parallel.
Common moves include:
The goal is better visibility for the teams who need to act, and better service for the members who need support.
Fraud teams see it as SSN misuse. Deposit operations sees it in reclamation letters and member servicing. Compliance sees it in audit findings. A layered approach to mortality data closes those views before each team finds the problem on its own.
For most banks and credit unions, identifying a deceased account holder is where the work begins.
What follows is often more involved:
Gaps in the data slow detection. They also slow everything that comes after.
Surface deceased customers and members across the portfolio with validated, multi-source mortality data.
Find beneficiaries and next of kin using verified relationship and contact data, reducing legal exposure and delay.
Close out accounts, support families, and document the trail in line with internal policy and regulatory expectations.
Banks and credit unions choose the path that fits their workflows, data governance posture, and operational goals. Many start with one and add the other later.
A drop-in replacement for the LADMF with four times the coverage, an identical file layout, and zero PII required from your institution.
U.S. deaths covered
vs. LADMF coverage
PII required
A comprehensive death audit service with daily monitoring, expert validation, and built-in data enrichment.
Decedent coverage
Match accuracy
False positive rate
Berwyn supports both identification and the work that follows, including beneficiary and next-of-kin search, with solutions built for the regulatory expectations of FDIC, OCC, and NCUA examiners.
Berwyn brings nearly 40 years of population intelligence experience to banks, credit unions, insurance carriers, healthcare plans, and pensions. More than 2,000 organizations rely on us for death audits, missing participants, and beneficiary identification. Behind every decision is a real person, and we treat the work that way.
Most banks and credit unions start with a simple question: “What does this actually look like in our portfolio?”
Organizations across financial services, insurance, healthcare, and pensions trust Berwyn. We monitor more than 45 million people each year with a false positive rate below 0.03%.
We’ll analyze a sample of your customer or member file and show you:
Typically delivered within five business days · No obligation to move forward
Practical material for the questions compliance, BSA, and operations leaders are already working through.
The SSA’s Limited Access Death Master File has steadily lost coverage since access changes that took effect in 2011. Berwyn extends beyond it with more than 40,000 sources, including state vital records, obituaries, and verified relationship data, to deliver 98% coverage at 99% accuracy.
Most don’t find it directly. It surfaces through fraud investigations where a deceased SSN has been used to open an account, through Treasury reclamation letters, or during unclaimed property audits when examiners flag accounts without living owners.
FDIC, OCC, and NCUA examiners now expect a documented process for identifying deceased customers and members and acting on them promptly. Reliance on the LADMF alone is unlikely to meet that expectation given its known coverage limits.
Berwyn runs a sample of your customer or member file and returns findings within about five business days. There is no commitment to engage further.
The results show how many potentially deceased customers and members appear in your sample, where they sit across your portfolio, and how similar institutions have handled comparable findings. From there, you decide whether and how to proceed.The results show how many potentially deceased customers and members appear in your sample, where they sit across your portfolio, and how similar institutions have handled comparable findings. From there, you decide whether and how to proceed.
Request a sample analysis. We’ll show you what this looks like in your portfolio, with no obligation to move forward.
